Originally Posted By: crimpy
you campground haters probably vote against bettering our schools to save a buck as well.


Absolutely not. Completely untrue in our case. I stated as much in my letter to officials, that I am ok with the campground in its initial 50 site state.

Having just read through some docs that Susan provided (a draft MOA), the proposal she has made IMO would be an asset and a community resource rather than a nuisance and a hazard.

Crimpy, I'd like to think that dissenting opinions are welcome here, but I am offended by your straw man argument. If it had been a school that was proposed to be built on that site we would have been 100% for it.

I suggest you contact Susan and read the MOA, IMO it's a facility that anyone with a tiny whit of environmental concern or interest in the outdoors could approve of.