|
4 registered (anthonyb, oenophore, Dana, 1 invisible),
10
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
#18155 - 02/18/06 03:28 AM
Re: Why The Mohonk Trust?
[Re: raelian]
|
enthusiast
Registered: 03/18/05
Posts: 293
Loc: Holiday Inn Express
|
Maybe you should get out of the MF subjunctive you self-styled liberal whacko. It you want to climb along the river, do it. Express yourself and claim first amendment.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#18156 - 02/18/06 12:03 PM
Re: Why The Mohonk Trust?
[Re: raelian]
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 11/29/99
Posts: 4230
Loc: Poughkeepsie
|
Quote:
... to my contention that Mohonk Preserve helps to enable the PIPC's bone-headedness.
This is clearly the case at Sam's Point "Preserve", where a large part of their climbing prohibition is merely that there are other locations along the ridge where climbing is allowed, so they don't have to allow it.
The other part of their ban concerns endangered species and potential habitat e.g. nesting sites, therefor. This has some merit for the remote sections of the preserve, but there are nice climber-friendly crags within 1/4 mile of the new Visitor Center building (sound familiar? But no, this is no Taj Mahal) that have a motor vehicle road at the base and a concrete wall and viewing platform directly atop them. Yet these "wilderness" areas are off limits as well. The powers that be clearly have not even tried to come up with a fair and reasonable climbing policy. They just took the easy way out because they could.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#18158 - 02/20/06 06:43 PM
Re: Why The Mohonk PRESERVE?
[Re: caver]
|
newbie
Registered: 12/27/02
Posts: 33
Loc: Jersey City
|
Things aren't too bad currently and maybe that's all for the best. Certainly the Preserve is actively helpful to climbers --almost the reverse of PIPC--- and Trapps/Nears are the only place worth much anyway. (One hopes I'm at least a tiny bit wrong in saying so....)
But I don't think its an absolute certaintly that things currently are for the best---And do think it's amusing to speculate and ramble insanely about alternatives:
For example; maybe the Climber's Coalition could sponsor a trip by the Chamber of Commerce from that Mexican climbing town near South Texas to provide testimony to the PIPC......
In yet a third scenario, climbing becomes an Olympic sport...... and boys & girls from both SUNY & north Jersey win medals.....The park puts up signs everwhere.
====
Edited by raelian (02/21/06 05:11 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#18160 - 02/21/06 03:16 PM
Re: Why The Mohonk Trust?
[Re: raelian]
|
enthusiast
Registered: 04/19/04
Posts: 347
|
Quote:
No serious refutations, apparently, to my contention that Mohonk Preserve helps to enable the PIPC's bone-headedness. If PIPC had to work with climbers regarding the Trapps, (and obviously they would, if they managed it) they'd be potentially forced into putting the whole ball of wax on the table.
I thought it was actually the U.S. Army that is responsible for banning climbing on PIPC lands. As their progressive closure for military training use concided with the discovery of the Gunks and an all-out war effort, nobody really complained, and nobody complained loud enough after the war to open up the PIPC crags again since everybody continued past them to the Gunks anyway. [This all being before Minnewaska was added to PIPC, so their policies were in place they started managing Minnewaska.] So this whole discussion is about 50 years overdue. Or am I way off base?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#18161 - 02/22/06 01:16 AM
Re: Why The Mohonk Trust?
[Re: tradjunkie]
|
newbie
Registered: 12/27/02
Posts: 33
Loc: Jersey City
|
West Point banned hiking on their lands around the time you mention. An interesting story. Why didn't Fritz W climb in Palisades? Or did he?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#18162 - 02/22/06 12:41 PM
Re: Why The Mohonk Trust?
[Re: raelian]
|
enthusiast
Registered: 04/19/04
Posts: 347
|
He did climb in the Palisades Park lands, though I don't think the 'Palisades' proper. In the 1930's, Wiessner and the AMC would regularly go to three or four cliffs in the PIPC lands on weekends. I think people started climbing in the Palisades in the late 1800s. One day he famously spotted the Gunks from the top of Breakneck Ridge and decided his next trip should be to go check it out - 1935, I think? Once people discovered the nearly endless supply of rock at the Gunks - taller, better quality, and much more extensive than any crag in the Hudson Highlands, the climber traffic moved north. Maybe Arden Cliff had traffic a little longer since it was easy to get to by train (fewer automobiles back then; rail service to Arden was discontinued long ago), but as routes like High E were seeing first ascents, West Point training activities were taking over all the steep rock near West Point -- which was being conveniently abandoned by climbers. You might be able to find the story in that book "Yankee Rock and Ice" by the Watermans.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#18164 - 02/22/06 02:35 PM
Re: Why The Mohonk Trust?
[Re: Timbo]
|
gumby
Registered: 03/12/02
Posts: 2308
Loc: Hudson Valley, NY
|
Yah, it eez pozzibul. Vee go climb upundzee der cliff, ya? Ya!  On a clear day, you can see the Gunks, and the lower Cats from on top of Breakneck, or Taurus, Mt Beacon, etc.
_________________________
"Flailing?" "Flail on!"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|