Shout Box

Who's Online
2 registered (fotovult, Rickster), 17 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Page 6 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >
Topic Options
#19497 - 06/14/06 04:42 AM Re: 5.8's in the Nears [Re: dalguard]
fear Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 06/27/03
Posts: 220
Loc: New England
Quote:

... The trick to MT is that it's got a trick. If done right, it's easily 5.8 but you'll never do it right on the first try....




All right... cough up the trick.

-Fear

Top
#19498 - 06/14/06 01:51 PM Re: 5.8's in the Nears [Re: fear]
nerdom Offline
Pooh-Bah *

Registered: 09/07/01
Posts: 2483
Loc: Davis Sq., MA
Forget tricks - go to Janette's website (cliffmama.com) and check out the pics of Johnny-somebody-or-other climbing MT. It freakin' diagrams the roof sequence move-by-move!
_________________________
we're all living proof that nothing lasts

Top
#19499 - 06/14/06 02:09 PM Re: 5.8's in the Nears [Re: nerdom]
alicex4 Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 07/05/00
Posts: 3399
It's Johnny on the Rocks

Top
#19500 - 06/14/06 02:58 PM Re: 5.8's in the Nears [Re: fear]
dalguard Offline
veteran

Registered: 03/22/00
Posts: 1515
Loc: CT
FYI, I pm'd Fear as I know some people don't like beta.

Top
#19501 - 06/14/06 03:08 PM Re: 5.8's in the Nears [Re: dalguard]
chip Online   content
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 10/06/01
Posts: 2554
Loc: Sittin' Pretty in Fat City
since the topic is about the nears, thought to relate that Broken Sling kicked my ass on Sunday. I thought I was pretty competant on 8s before this. The initial climbing before and including placing my first pro left me done and required 3 long hangs to finish the climb. Thankfully, BD2 didn't get a hand cramp from all the time he had me locked off.
Might have been different for me on TR, as Eastertime, Far from the Maddening Crowd, and even Good Friday felt way easier later that day when following. Of course, these climbs were also more of a face climb.

Top
#19502 - 06/14/06 03:18 PM Re: 5.8's in the Nears [Re: fear]
pedestrian Offline
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/05/02
Posts: 2244
Loc: a heavily fortified bunker!
Quote:

Quote:

... The trick to MT is that it's got a trick. If done right, it's easily 5.8 but you'll never do it right on the first try....




All right... cough up the trick.

-Fear





just don't waste energy slinging the tree. stay on the route, which moves to the right

Top
#19503 - 06/14/06 06:21 PM Re: 5.8's in the Nears [Re: drkodos]
browndog2 Offline
old hand

Registered: 04/24/01
Posts: 758
Loc: livin' on the edge
Quote:


Grading of rock climbs is not as subjective as many people think. There is actuallly an underlying science behind it that most people tend to ignore since it often does not fit well with their personal paradigms, needs, desires, or wishes.




Well, good doctor, would you be so kind as to enlighten the poster who inspired your quoted reply, myself, and the rest of the GDC community, and reveal the underlying science of rock climb grading, especially vis-a-vis the climbs at issue.
_________________________
(not that there's anything wrong with that...sorta)

Top
#19504 - 06/14/06 07:33 PM Re: 5.8's in the Nears [Re: browndog2]
Frank Florence Offline
addict

Registered: 01/05/00
Posts: 515
Loc: Watertown or Bend
I had a similar 'grade the climb, not the climber' conversation earlier this week. Is the process scientific? Drkodos can tackle that. But it is iterative, as with a theory subject to modification upon further testing. And going back to the point that started all this, I'd agree that it's not that useful to compare the difficulty of Son of Easy O's P2 with High E, other than to say that both pitches involve large handholds.

Since the OP was talking about 8s in the Nears, I'll shift back on topic. Both Broken Sling and Farewell to Arms were mentioned, as was Alphonse. All 8s, but hardly equal. Alphonse has one 5.8 move on it, whereas the other two are considerably more burly and continuous at the grade. Yet in my opinion, they're the climbs to go for. Farewell is a climb that anyone who gets a charge out of the crimpy puzzles that Annie Oh! presents will probably enjoy. As a kid I liked to play on a jungle gym, and I'm reminded of the fun that was on both of these climbs.

Top
#19505 - 06/14/06 11:18 PM Re: 5.8's in the Nears [Re: Frank Florence]
Smike Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/01/01
Posts: 3134
Loc: in your backyard
Grades Scientific? What? If we were all built exactly the same as human beings that conversation *might* not be waste of bandwidth.

Screw the grades, if you climb by the grades you will only be fighting your own mind of how things 'should' be, and try to either rationalize a climb to fit the grade or curse it to no end as a sandbag.

I don't mean take off on 11 r's when you’re looking for 8's but enjoy the routes for what they are, infinite variations of movement over rock. Sometimes you don’t get to complete all the moves but that’s what they make tomorrow for.

Top
#19506 - 06/16/06 01:49 AM Re: 5.8's in the Nears [Re: drkodos]
greyalien Offline
journeyman

Registered: 05/06/05
Posts: 84
Loc: Central Nj
Quote:

(Dr. kodos): Grading of rock climbs is not as subjective as many people think. There is actuallly an underlying science behind it that most people tend to ignore since it often does not fit well with their personal paradigms, needs, desires, or wishes.




Do you have any idea what you are talking about? Are you totally clueless as to how a route gets its grade? Its pretty simple. First the FA party climbs it, and they tack on whatever number they f---ing feel like. It might be way sandbagged or soft as hell, but then over the years the route gets climbed more and subsequent parties come to a consensus on the grade. The number that is agreed on reflects the communities' opinion of the overall difficulty. There is no underlying science, you wont find any FA parties plugging numbers into their calculators.


Edited by greyalien (06/16/06 01:51 AM)
_________________________
- Grey

Top
Page 6 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >


Moderator:  Mike Rawdon, Steven Cherry 
Sponsored