|
0 registered (),
7
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
#21171 - 05/23/06 10:31 PM
Dear Glen Hoagland
|
journeyman
Registered: 04/06/06
Posts: 75
Loc: NY, CA, Deutschland
|
Dear Glen Hoagland,
In a recent post on Gunks.com entitled "an open letter to the Mohonk Preserve" you state that the Mohonk Preserve has friendly relations with over 200 of your neighbors. How many of those 200 neighbors would call the Mohonk Preserve a friend? I note this because you only have 13 families on the post entitled "preserve neighbors speak up". If you are so friendly with the others, why such a short list? Have you had contact with all 200+ neighbors to attest to this friendship? Was the letter by Mrs. Boice Wick a fluke, or are there others that you wrongly spoke for. The "Preserve neighbors speak up" post was also under the Mohonk Preserve username which begs the question, did you have to solicit those names? Or were these "friendly" neighbors that you speak of, writting on their own behalf? I found Bob Anderberg's signature quite interesting. As the executive director, it would seem like a good idea to see why some of your neighbors are angry with You and the Mohonk Preserve. But the problem is, You just deny everything, fail to respond, or lie. An example of this can be seen in your response at the end of the Susan Boice Wick letter.
Glenn Hoagland, Executive Director of the Mohonk Preserve, responds to Susan Wicks letter: Having had a lengthy, amicable meeting with you several years ago, we are surprised that you have waited until now to air your concerns- and in the press, rather than to the Preserve directly. If you would like to discuss and resolve these issues directly, please contact me directly. The Preserve policy is to work one-on-one with our neighbors to reach agreements, rather than misdirecting such communications via the press. We look forward to hearing from you.
You appear surprised that she is so angry, I guess you thought you were friends..... Well Glen, wake up! How many of the people on the "preserve neighbors speak up post" have you contacted, after this post was submitted, to try and remedy the problem? People are pissed Glen, and your 200+ friendly neighbors speech is as tiring as Bush's Iraq speech. Even your response to Susan Boice Wick is full of contradictions. For example you wrote in the above statement "The Preserve policy is to work one-on-one with our neighbors to reach agreements, rather than misdirecting such communications via the press." Yet you use the press in the same way that the Mohonk Neighbors did. As the executive director of the Mohonk Preserve an explaination to the above questions is requested. Thanks.
I look forward to your response.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#21173 - 05/25/06 02:51 AM
Re: Dear Glen Hoagland
[Re: drkodos]
|
journeyman
Registered: 04/06/06
Posts: 75
Loc: NY, CA, Deutschland
|
Quote:
Holding you breath? hehehe
There will be no response. And if there is, it will be a vague, non-commital, non-denial denial that tells us nothing but attempts to spin the facts and make covert their warts.
Bureaucracies cannot afford to get into pissing contests because they could actually lose.
I am willing to hear their spin on it.............Bueller.........Bueller........anyone.......Hoagland......
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#21175 - 05/30/06 12:07 PM
Re: Dear Glen Hoagland
[Re: drkodos]
|
journeyman
Registered: 04/06/06
Posts: 75
Loc: NY, CA, Deutschland
|
Quote:
Still waiting.
Well Dr K. It's only been a week.......... Maybe Glen is on vacation, had a family emergency, or is contemplating a well thought out response. I'm sure he'll get around to it soon, I mean, saving the land for life is a big job.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#21176 - 05/30/06 01:22 PM
Re: Dear Glen Hoagland
[Re: smokejumper1]
|
Site Supporter
Registered: 03/13/01
Posts: 110
Loc: new paltz
|
Quote:
But the problem is, You just deny everything, fail to respond, or lie.
part of the difficulty in Web communication seems to be that irony is lost, so I can't tell if you truly expect a reply from Glen.
Me? I wouldn't even bother responding to someone who wrote the above. But that's just me.
Or perhaps Glen is suspicious of anonymous diatribes. Kodos (Richard) and certainly Kent put their names to their words. Why not sign your post so he can know who's talking to him?
Of course, if you were being ironic, well then just forget everything I said.
Dell
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#21178 - 06/05/06 01:06 PM
Re: Dear Glen Hoagland
[Re: drkodos]
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 04/30/01
Posts: 4238
|
So, let me get this straight. You're not going to climb at the gunks anymore?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|