how do you call syria blatantly funding hamas nonstate?
First, I think they're more Hezbollah funders, less soHamas funders.
Second, wouldn't blowing up Syria would be the best recruitment for Hezbollah anyone could dream up?
Third, Hezbollah started up as a response to Israel's invasion of Lebanon in the '80s. It existed before Syria saw it could be used to advance Syria's interests, and I doubt it would go away if Syria didn't exist.
good law abiding blacks do not keep quiet and allow their friends to fund ghetto trouble causing blacks to sneak into malls and churches and blow innocent people up.
So what's your plan? Arrest all of them? Anyone who doesn't take action gets put in jail? On what grounds? (Failure to disclose a criminal activity that one is not involved in is, to the best of my knowledge, not a crime.) And how can anyone prove he/she didn't know? The inability to prove a negative is what got us into Iraq--and we can see how much safer that's made us.
If you can describe how blowing up countries would make us safer, I'd be glad to read about it. But the practical consequences to me makes it sound like a strategy that is more likely to leave us worse off than one that would solve any real problems, for the reasons I've stated previously. I understand the anger, but I don't think it's helpful in any practical sense.