|
4 registered (oenophore, RobT, anthonyb, 1 invisible),
9
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
#41930 - 11/24/08 03:27 PM
Re: Rosendale Cave CLOSED TO CLIMBING
[Re: Kent]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 11/15/99
Posts: 1816
Loc: Denver, CO
|
No offshore trips? Damn! I really want to get back out for some big fish after getting sailfish on a fly rod a few months back in Guatemala.
Kent, I do feel for you with your situation. I just don't understand why you would punish someone like me that had absolutely nothing to do with your situation and no ability to change it. I feel bad for Eddie too - it sucks when people don't respect your property.
I just have a fundamental disagreement with how to handle this sort of problem. As a landowner, my philosophy is to work with recreational groups to give as much access as possible, if for no other reason than to help set an example for other landowners that have land I want access to. I am so grateful for generous landowners that give me access to climb, fish, hike, hunt, surf, etc. In return, I am a good steward of those lands and respect the owner's privacy. If asked, I do more - i've seen some really positive communities in the west where user groups have helped landowners repair fences, rehabilitate streams, clean up days, etc. The fly fishing community seems to do this much better than the climbing community - maybe there are lessons to be learned there.
I just ask that all landowners think back to how much they have benefited from access to private lands in the past, and to ask themselves if they can't help pay back that trust by granting access of their own. We could lose places like where Eddie and I went fishing in Utah(all private land) without that kind of generosity.
_________________________
This isn't an office. It's Hell with fluorescent lighting.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#41933 - 11/24/08 03:39 PM
Re: Rosendale Cave CLOSED TO CLIMBING
[Re: RangerRob]
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 10/06/01
Posts: 2652
Loc: Sittin' Pretty in Fat City
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#41935 - 11/24/08 03:58 PM
Re: Rosendale Cave CLOSED TO CLIMBING
[Re: Kent]
|
addict
Registered: 08/30/01
Posts: 621
Loc: Bergen County NJ
|
Well Kent- those that pushed for the zoning law no doubt belong to many groups, and those groups no doubt have many members, but that does not make each and every member of those groups guilty by association.
Most climbers who are preserve members joined simply to gain access to the property; they are not weighing in on (nor do they have much say) in what the preserve is doing on various issues.
I think the climbers have become a scapegoat here, because it is easy for the landowners to harm them (through removing access) than to get at the preserve directly.
None of this has anything to do with Rosendale.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#41941 - 11/24/08 05:32 PM
Re: Rosendale Cave CLOSED TO CLIMBING
[Re: Kent]
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 07/10/00
Posts: 3532
|
...until the community took hundreds of thousands of dollars in property value from them. Please clarify this for us. Are you suggesting that talus slope and cliff face are worth hundreds of kilobucks in property value?
_________________________
- Marc
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#41942 - 11/24/08 06:13 PM
Re: Rosendale Cave CLOSED TO CLIMBING
[Re: MarcC]
|
old hand
Registered: 01/21/00
Posts: 1004
Loc: The Bayards
|
Are you suggesting that talus slope and cliff face are worth hundreds of kilobucks in property value? No, but the slopes below the cliff face and talus slopes are (were) worth kilo bucks.
Edited by Kent (11/24/08 06:16 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#41943 - 11/24/08 09:07 PM
Re: Rosendale Cave CLOSED TO CLIMBING
[Re: Kent]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 08/05/02
Posts: 2244
Loc: a heavily fortified bunker!
|
hundreds of thousands is an awfully big number, Kent. You should be prepared to justify it. Where I come from, an empty house lot is not worth that much.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|