|
0 registered (),
9
Guests and
2
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
#45045 - 05/27/09 09:05 PM
Time for e climbing ethics debate
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 06/06/00
Posts: 3730
Loc: Ulster County, NY
|
It's been a long time since we argued about actual climbing ethics around here, so let's try to piss some people off, eh? Was out climbing Sunday evening in the Nears, and as we walked underneath Kansas City we could see that it had obviously been fixed for a free ascent. There was gear left in place all the way down to the ground with draws. The presence of draws is what tells me that it was someone trying to free it. There was no one around as we walked in around 4pm, and still no one around as we left at around 7pm. We came back around 10:30 and we were going to do our cliff scavenger thing, but the gear was gone by then.
My question is...do people have the right to fix a route like that with their gear, and leave it for a period of time? Do they have a reasonable right to expect to see their gear still there when they come back? Especially when it was fixed all the way to the ground. I little bouldering about 15' off the ground would have removed a brand new camalot along with a quickdraw. It is my contention that Kansas City is not exactly a cutting edge route, and has been free climbed by hundreds of people since the 1970's. Fixing your own gear on it and leaving it for a later time is extremely selfish and is not acceptable. If you want to fix and come down, and then attempt it then feel free. But what if you leave your gear, and someone else wants to climb it after you leave? Now they have to get your gear out of the way before they can climb the route the way it is meant to be climbed. I can reasonably see fixing something like Spinal Traction, which has not yet been freed. Even though it does get in the way of an aid ascent, the free ascent should take precedence. But Kansas City??? C'mon!
For what it is worth, if we had scored that gear I would have notified the preserve that if anyone came asking about gear they had left on Kansas City to please tell them I had it. But once you leave gear on the cliff, especially here in the Gunks, it is free for the taking! Just my opinion.
RR
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#45046 - 05/27/09 09:10 PM
Re: Time for e climbing ethics debate
[Re: RangerRob]
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 10/06/01
Posts: 2652
Loc: Sittin' Pretty in Fat City
|
Your point is quite valid, RR, but I also like to cut folk a break if possible and give it a day. I always try to think of reasons they may have left it, including injury. Now if my whole weekend had been about aiding up K.C., I'd have been less laid back about it. My rule has always been that if I walk away it is booty gear.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#45086 - 05/28/09 03:17 PM
Re: Time for e climbing ethics debate
[Re: RangerRob]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 11/15/99
Posts: 1816
Loc: Denver, CO
|
Gear was fixed on the 5.easy climbing up to the roof? That makes it a really goofy situation. I can see leaving a couple of pieces fixed in the roof while trying to free it, but not down low on the easy stuff.
Lots of gumbie aid climber epics happen there, so it is possible the gear was there just long enough for someone to drive to rock and snow and ask someone how to jumar.
_________________________
This isn't an office. It's Hell with fluorescent lighting.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#45087 - 05/28/09 03:20 PM
Re: Time for e climbing ethics debate
[Re: RangerRob]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 12/23/99
Posts: 2177
Loc: Berkshires, MA and Ahlington, ...
|
I'm amused that someone would fix gear between the ground and the roof cuz it's basically a walk up.
Kids these days.
Ta, Dizz
Edited by Dizzy (05/28/09 03:21 PM) Edit Reason: Edited to reflect that andrew's post occured while I was writing
_________________________
I can handle reality in small doses, but as a lifestyle it's way too confining -Lily Tomlin
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|