|
2 registered (Rickster, 1 invisible),
6
Guests and
2
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
#49998 - 12/09/09 04:35 PM
Re: Free Markets, aka, State-sponsored capitalism, aka
[Re: oenophore]
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 07/05/00
Posts: 3400
|
'Not quite socialism or fascism."
That's why they call it communitarianism.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#50012 - 12/10/09 04:38 PM
Re: Free Markets, aka, State-sponsored capitalism, aka
[Re: alicex4]
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 09/24/01
Posts: 5856
Loc: 212 land
|
'Not quite socialism or fascism."
That's why they call it communitarianism. Can you call TARP or the like communitarian?
_________________________
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#50015 - 12/10/09 06:08 PM
Re: Free Markets, aka, State-sponsored capitalism, aka
[Re: oenophore]
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 07/05/00
Posts: 3400
|
TARP is just a violation of the constitution.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#50019 - 12/11/09 01:03 AM
Re: Free Markets, aka, State-sponsored capitalism, aka
[Re: alicex4]
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 07/10/00
Posts: 3532
|
Conservatives feel that TARP is just a violation of the constitution. But until a court test, it's merely the opinion predominantly of people with little or no understanding of constitutional law. Fixed that for ya.
_________________________
- Marc
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#50025 - 12/11/09 12:55 PM
Re: Free Markets, aka, State-sponsored capitalism, aka
[Re: oenophore]
|
old hand
Registered: 05/26/04
Posts: 764
|
Can you provide any documentation for that assertion? This was the question I would would have like Alice to answer more specificly than simply saying the Constitution. Seriously! Actually aren
Edited by mworking (12/11/09 12:57 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#50026 - 12/11/09 02:02 PM
Re: Free Markets, aka, State-sponsored capitalism, aka
[Re: oenophore]
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 07/10/00
Posts: 3532
|
Can you provide any documentation for that assertion? To refute it, one may merely name a critical number of conservatives with good understanding of constitutional law. Perhaps you cite the constitutional clause that authorizes Congress to enable TARP. 1) Google <TARP is a violation of the constitution> - you'll find sufficient hits on the first two pages, including analysis of a federal court case. You'll also find numerous hits at conservative blogs and news sites asserting the violation of the constitution - but not a lot of agreement on exactly what is violated. 2) The constitution is a document with far more verbiage that prevents things rather than expressly authorizing them.
Edited by MarcC (12/11/09 05:49 PM) Edit Reason: fix cheesetitted spelling
_________________________
- Marc
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|