Shout Box

Who's Online
0 registered (), 12 Guests and 3 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#57458 - 05/15/11 04:21 PM Re: Rethinking the Girth Hitch?? [Re: rg@ofmc]
stoopid Offline
journeyman

Registered: 10/09/08
Posts: 67
Loc: West Sand Lake, NY
Originally Posted By: rg@ofmc
Whenever these discussions come up, it is always mentioned that you shouldn't be taking high fall factor falls on a tether anyway, and doing so constitutes pilot error rather than a failure of a protection system never intended for such eventualities. The fact remains that there are situations in which a climber might have to make a move or two above an anchor they are tethered to. The pilot-error position says that those are "leader must not fall" conditions and the climber should view themselves as being unprotected.


Never a truer statement posted. Climbers push their gear much further than can be reasonably expected. The fact there aren't more incidents, I think, is an indication of how well the gear is holding up, not how poorly it performs because of isolated incidents.

Top
#71265 - 04/04/14 09:59 AM Re: Rethinking the Girth Hitch?? [Re: rg@ofmc]
oenophore Online   confused
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/24/01
Posts: 5968
Loc: 212 land
A thread deviation perhaps: What Chip calls spectra* and RG calls dyneema* are the same stuff.

*These, being trademarked, properly have their first letters uppercased, but I directly quote the above authors.
_________________________

Top
#71274 - 04/07/14 02:43 PM Re: Rethinking the Girth Hitch?? [Re: oenophore]
chip Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 10/06/01
Posts: 2676
Loc: Sittin' Pretty in Fat City
Thanks for the gentle correction, Oeno.

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2


Moderator:  daryl512 
Sponsored