|
0 registered (),
7
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
#60275 - 09/19/11 05:55 PM
Re: Rope swing at the Gunks...
[Re: Kent]
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 11/29/99
Posts: 4230
Loc: Poughkeepsie
|
How about a zipline to traverse the closed section of Near Trapps without technically setting foot on it? Now THAT would be neat. Air rights will be protected under UN Resolution S/RES/1983 (2011) allowing the use of surface to air missiles against an aggressor to protect sovereignty. Ah, Kent "gets it". AG... needs a sense of humor.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#60276 - 09/19/11 06:02 PM
Re: Rope swing at the Gunks...
[Re: chip]
|
addict
Registered: 08/03/10
Posts: 653
Loc: New Paltz,Marbletown,Gardiner,...
|
Kent, I have to admit that I feel the vast majority of climbers have alwyas been very respectful to the land owners whose land they have crossed, knowingly or unknowingly, and yet the access to continue doing so was removed by the landowner. The reaction to close this land continues to be directed at those who are unlikely to generate any change to the initial beef and generally did not cause the conflict. This is why climbers continue to have difficulty understanding why they should then react with respect to the closure. I don't want to stir this up again and certainly agree that someone should always have the right to prevent others from crossing property they own. I have respected this closure from the start. I just wanted to express my perception of why this situation is not percieved as appropriate to the climbers. Chip, why is the reason important? Respecting a land closure should not be "difficult for climbers to understand". If someone closes their land, it's closed, end of discussion. Respect it and move on to the thousands of other routes in the area. The kind of comments from Mike Rawdon and the actions of Trappdyke and the like will only ensure that more land closes. MPNA
_________________________
The MPNA is an advocacy group for adjacent neighbors of the Mohonk Preserve. In the event of a dispute with the Mohonk Preserve, we can offer assistance in obtaining experts in the following areas; Surveying, Lawyers, Title, expert witnesses, ancient document research, and Maps.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#60281 - 09/19/11 10:28 PM
Re: Rope swing at the Gunks...
[Re: Kent]
|
newbie
Registered: 09/19/03
Posts: 29
|
When did Gunks.com become Supertopo.com?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#60282 - 09/19/11 10:56 PM
Re: Rope swing at the Gunks...
[Re: jsj42]
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 09/24/01
Posts: 5856
Loc: 212 land
|
When did Gunks.com become Supertopo.com? Uh oh, look for a hostile takeover.
_________________________
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#60284 - 09/19/11 11:23 PM
Re: Rope swing at the Gunks...
[Re: Advocacy group]
|
enthusiast
Registered: 04/25/03
Posts: 299
|
hey Chris, Want to elaborate on those restraining orders the Preserve needs to keep YOU from cutting down their trees, building fires and generally being a PITA?
Chip, why is the reason important? Respecting a land closure should not be "difficult for climbers to understand". If someone closes their land, it's closed, end of discussion.
That said, I have to give you credit for wanting to keep other discussions on thread. A lot of the initial irritation with the initial MPNA thread was precisely because it didn't belong in general climbing. Even you seem to be learning, so kudos.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#60307 - 09/20/11 06:02 PM
Re: Rope swing at the Gunks...
[Re: Kent]
|
enthusiast
Registered: 06/29/11
Posts: 344
|
...and some of them also destroy private property and the MP does nothing to stop them. Please substantiate this charge. And it's no wonder some MP members are so disrepectful of MP neighbors. Look at the Mohonk Preserve and the example they set: quit claim deeds, lawsuits, and zoning to strip development rights away from neighbors so targeted land is cheaper to buy. And now, the campground. The Mohonk Preserve has flipped the campground property to the PIPC specifically so they don't have to comply with state and town law, effectively shoving the campground down the throats of neighbors in that area. Talk about living in fantasy land. Endless ranting about the same old 2 or 3 quit claim deeds, the same old 3 lawsuits, and the orchestration of zoning laws. Newsflash! The MP didn't vote in the zoning law - your neighbors did! The campground isn't on MP land, so it makes sense to hand it over to some other entity to manage. And it's not like there wasn't a campground in that vicinity, and the nearest neighbor is what, the distance of a football field away? I will add a caveat however. A few years ago Hank did call and ask about rerouting the Millbrook Ridge Trail off private land along the top of the Nears and Bayards. In several places it was rerouted but little is done to ensure MP members and guests follow the new routing and stay on MP land. Man, nothing is ever good enough for you. You can probably solve all your angst by simply selling off your land that abuts the MP. Nah,....probably not...seems like you and AG are just bitter, old, scared men.
Edited by retroscree (09/20/11 06:04 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|