Shout Box

Who's Online
1 registered (1 invisible), 8 Guests and 3 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
#68861 - 09/21/13 11:13 AM Again, why did it take a UK paper to reveal this?
oenophore Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/24/01
Posts: 5968
Loc: 212 land
_________________________

Top
#68862 - 09/21/13 04:40 PM Re: Again, why did it take a UK paper to reveal this? [Re: oenophore]
retroscree Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 06/29/11
Posts: 397
Maybe because it's basically old news, with little new information revealed via the FOIA request, which is what the Guardian is really reporting.

Top
#68882 - 09/23/13 08:35 PM Re: Again, why did it take a UK paper to reveal this? [Re: oenophore]
quanto_the_mad Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/14/02
Posts: 2628
Loc: brooklyn
Originally Posted By: oenophore


Maybe because you're not looking hard enough?

From Sep 15 Mother Jones
A Sneak Peek at Eric Schlosser's Terrifying New Book on Nuclear Weapons

From Sep 16 Politico
Neglecting our nukes
_________________________


Top
#68883 - 09/23/13 11:31 PM Re: Again, why did it take a UK paper to reveal this? [Re: quanto_the_mad]
oenophore Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/24/01
Posts: 5968
Loc: 212 land
I posted after I read the Saturday (Sep. 21) NY Times and did not see that story. Mother Jones may have scooped the Guardian but I don't read either (I saw the story on Google News.)
_________________________

Top


Sponsored