Again, why did it take a UK paper to reveal this?

Posted by: oenophore

Again, why did it take a UK paper to reveal this? - 09/21/13 11:13 AM

North Carloina spared by sheer luck.
Posted by: retroscree

Re: Again, why did it take a UK paper to reveal this? - 09/21/13 04:40 PM

Maybe because it's basically old news, with little new information revealed via the FOIA request, which is what the Guardian is really reporting.
Posted by: quanto_the_mad

Re: Again, why did it take a UK paper to reveal this? - 09/23/13 08:35 PM

Originally Posted By: oenophore


Maybe because you're not looking hard enough?

From Sep 15 Mother Jones
A Sneak Peek at Eric Schlosser's Terrifying New Book on Nuclear Weapons

From Sep 16 Politico
Neglecting our nukes
Posted by: oenophore

Re: Again, why did it take a UK paper to reveal this? - 09/23/13 11:31 PM

I posted after I read the Saturday (Sep. 21) NY Times and did not see that story. Mother Jones may have scooped the Guardian but I don't read either (I saw the story on Google News.)